Talk:Ashtavakra: Mahageeta, Bhag 9 (अष्टावक्र : महागीता, भाग नौ) (9 volume set): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "About the dating of Vol 9, there seems to be a mistake. It would not have run over into Feb 11. No Pune 1 series ever did that, spill over into the camp dates of the other lan...") |
m (Rudra moved page Talk:Ashtavakra: Mahageeta, Bhag 9 (अष्टावक्र : महागीता, भाग नौ) to [[Talk:Ashtavakra: Mahageeta, Bhag 9 (अष्टावक्र : महागीता, भाग नौ) (9 vol...) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
About the dating of Vol 9, there seems to be a mistake. It would not have run over into Feb 11. No Pune 1 series ever did that, spill over into the camp dates of the other language. FWIW, the discourse details page, [[Osho | About the dating of Vol 9, there seems to be a mistake. It would not have run over into Feb 11. No Pune 1 series ever did that, spill over into the camp dates of the other language. FWIW, the discourse details page, [[Osho Timeline 1977]], has Vol 9 running from Jan 31 to Feb 10. This would also be fairly unusual, a more likely division being Vol 8 Jan 21-31 and Vol 9 Feb 1-10. But if Vol 9 really IS 11 discourses (rather than Vol 8), then Jan 31 to Feb 10 is what it must be. -- [[User:Sarlo|Sarlo]] ([[User talk:Sarlo|talk]]) 00:32, 18 August 2014 (PDT) | ||
---- | ---- |
Latest revision as of 14:28, 15 November 2020
About the dating of Vol 9, there seems to be a mistake. It would not have run over into Feb 11. No Pune 1 series ever did that, spill over into the camp dates of the other language. FWIW, the discourse details page, Osho Timeline 1977, has Vol 9 running from Jan 31 to Feb 10. This would also be fairly unusual, a more likely division being Vol 8 Jan 21-31 and Vol 9 Feb 1-10. But if Vol 9 really IS 11 discourses (rather than Vol 8), then Jan 31 to Feb 10 is what it must be. -- Sarlo (talk) 00:32, 18 August 2014 (PDT)