Talk:Gorchichnoe zerno (Горчичное зерно): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
Dhyanantar (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
sorry, you lost me. unless this is really important, let's just drop it. ;)--[[User:Rudra|Rudra]] ([[User talk:Rudra|talk]]) 06:21, 17 February 2017 (UTC) | sorry, you lost me. unless this is really important, let's just drop it. ;)--[[User:Rudra|Rudra]] ([[User talk:Rudra|talk]]) 06:21, 17 February 2017 (UTC) | ||
---------- | ---------- | ||
In my opinion it is important. I always believe more much Edition notes then a cover. Maybe is here so clear? | |||
"Please note Edition notice (Colophon) indicate the name of the subtitle "Комментарии к пятому Евангелию от св. Фомы"".--DhyanAntar 07:07, 17 February 2017 (UTC) | |||
----- |
Latest revision as of 07:07, 17 February 2017
you say
"Please note the name of the subtitle of the book "Комментарии к пятому Евангелию от св. Фомы", on the same point notes Edition notice (Colophon)."
i don't understand that.--Rudra (talk) 09:55, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
It is good for my studying English!! Sorry, I try again on example the 2007 edition:
- The cover have a name "Комментарии к Евангелию от Фомы"
- The subtitle of the book - "Комментарии к пятому Евангелию от св. Фомы" (as I think it should be on page 1, before Edition notice (Colophon, in German - Impressum))
- Edition notice (Colophon, in German - Impressum; maybe is it named mainpage?) have name "Комментарии к пятому Евангелию от св. Фомы" too.--DhyanAntar 10:13, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
sorry, you lost me. unless this is really important, let's just drop it. ;)--Rudra (talk) 06:21, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
In my opinion it is important. I always believe more much Edition notes then a cover. Maybe is here so clear?
"Please note Edition notice (Colophon) indicate the name of the subtitle "Комментарии к пятому Евангелию от св. Фомы"".--DhyanAntar 07:07, 17 February 2017 (UTC)