US trademark decision 2008 (source document): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
It is available here as a pdf: [[Media:Transcript of the US trademark decision 2008.pdf]]. | It is available here as a pdf: [[Media:Transcript of the US trademark decision 2008.pdf]]. | ||
The trademarks were cancelled because "defendant committed fraud upon the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) by executing the declarations in the involved applications and applications underlying the involved registrations in which it stated that no other person, firm, corporation or association has the right to use the involved alleged marks when it knew of such use." | The trademarks were cancelled because "'''defendant committed fraud upon the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)''' by executing the declarations in the involved applications and applications underlying the involved registrations in which it stated that no other person, firm, corporation or association has the right to use the involved alleged marks when it knew of such use." | ||
;see also | ;see also |
Revision as of 11:49, 29 February 2020
In the case of Osho Friends International v. Osho International Foundation, regarding the trademark "OSHO", the United States Patent and Trademark Office has published a decision.
It is available here as a pdf: Media:Transcript of the US trademark decision 2008.pdf.
The trademarks were cancelled because "defendant committed fraud upon the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) by executing the declarations in the involved applications and applications underlying the involved registrations in which it stated that no other person, firm, corporation or association has the right to use the involved alleged marks when it knew of such use."