Talk:Bahutere Hain Ghat (बहुतेरे हैं घाट): Difference between revisions

From The Sannyas Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
The ISBN 81-7621-044-0 for the Rebel edition has the distinction of being the least found (so far) of any Osho book ISBN. Not only were there zero hits but even the wiki's Special:BookSources page recognised somehow that it was not a valid ISBN. (7621 seems to be the publisher code for Hind Pocket Books, not a good start.) -- [[User:Sarlo|Sarlo]] ([[User talk:Sarlo|talk]]) 22:21, 2 April 2014 (PDT)
The ISBN 81-7621-044-0 for the Rebel edition has the distinction of being the least found (so far) of any Osho book ISBN. Not only were there zero hits but even the wiki's Special:BookSources page recognised somehow that it was not a valid ISBN. (7621 seems to be the publisher code for Hind Pocket Books, not a good start.) -- [[User:Sarlo|Sarlo]] ([[User talk:Sarlo|talk]]) 22:21, 2 April 2014 (PDT)
:प्रवचन (TOC):
:1. सत्संग: हृदय का हृदय से मौन मिलन
:2. प्रेम: ध्यान की ज्योति
:3. रसौ वै सः की धूम
:4. अंतिम स्वर्ण सोपान: परम मौन


Subtitle for the 2003 edition has been presumed on the basis of the 1989 edition's subtitle, though cover image (apparently more or less identical) is too small to verify 100%. -- doofus-9 07:02, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Subtitle for the 2003 edition has been presumed on the basis of the 1989 edition's subtitle, though cover image (apparently more or less identical) is too small to verify 100%. -- doofus-9 07:02, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:42, 15 March 2021

The ISBN 81-7621-044-0 for the Rebel edition has the distinction of being the least found (so far) of any Osho book ISBN. Not only were there zero hits but even the wiki's Special:BookSources page recognised somehow that it was not a valid ISBN. (7621 seems to be the publisher code for Hind Pocket Books, not a good start.) -- Sarlo (talk) 22:21, 2 April 2014 (PDT)

Subtitle for the 2003 edition has been presumed on the basis of the 1989 edition's subtitle, though cover image (apparently more or less identical) is too small to verify 100%. -- doofus-9 07:02, 18 December 2017 (UTC)