Talk:Ashtavakra: Mahageeta, Bhag 9 (अष्‍टावक्र : महागीता, भाग नौ) (9 volume set): Difference between revisions

From The Sannyas Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Rudra moved page Talk:Ashtavakra: Mahageeta, Bhag 9 (अष्‍टावक्र : महागीता, भाग नौ) to [[Talk:Ashtavakra: Mahageeta, Bhag 9 (अष्‍टावक्र : महागीता, भाग नौ) (9 vol...)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
About the dating of Vol 9, there seems to be a mistake. It would not have run over into Feb 11. No Pune 1 series ever did that, spill over into the camp dates of the other language. FWIW, the discourse details page, [[Osho Discourses 1977]], has Vol 9 running from Jan 31 to Feb 10. This would also be fairly unusual, a more likely division being Vol 8 Jan 21-31 and Vol 9  Feb 1-10. But if Vol 9 really IS 11 discourses (rather than Vol 8), then Jan 31 to Feb 10 is what it must be. -- [[User:Sarlo|Sarlo]] ([[User talk:Sarlo|talk]]) 00:32, 18 August 2014 (PDT)
About the dating of Vol 9, there seems to be a mistake. It would not have run over into Feb 11. No Pune 1 series ever did that, spill over into the camp dates of the other language. FWIW, the discourse details page, [[Osho Timeline 1977]], has Vol 9 running from Jan 31 to Feb 10. This would also be fairly unusual, a more likely division being Vol 8 Jan 21-31 and Vol 9  Feb 1-10. But if Vol 9 really IS 11 discourses (rather than Vol 8), then Jan 31 to Feb 10 is what it must be. -- [[User:Sarlo|Sarlo]] ([[User talk:Sarlo|talk]]) 00:32, 18 August 2014 (PDT)


----
----

Latest revision as of 14:28, 15 November 2020

About the dating of Vol 9, there seems to be a mistake. It would not have run over into Feb 11. No Pune 1 series ever did that, spill over into the camp dates of the other language. FWIW, the discourse details page, Osho Timeline 1977, has Vol 9 running from Jan 31 to Feb 10. This would also be fairly unusual, a more likely division being Vol 8 Jan 21-31 and Vol 9 Feb 1-10. But if Vol 9 really IS 11 discourses (rather than Vol 8), then Jan 31 to Feb 10 is what it must be. -- Sarlo (talk) 00:32, 18 August 2014 (PDT)