Talk:Letter written on 12 Feb 1967: Difference between revisions

From The Sannyas Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 25: Line 25:
--[[User:Rudra|Rudra]] ([[User talk:Rudra|talk]]) 00:43, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
--[[User:Rudra|Rudra]] ([[User talk:Rudra|talk]]) 00:43, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
--------
--------
Okay. -- doofus-9 04:40, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:40, 30 May 2017

Sarlo,

this page is currently an unlinked orphan.

--Rudra (talk) 14:36, 29 May 2017 (UTC)


Technically not exactly true, ie the article and the pic link to each other, but you can say they are co-orphans. My dilemma was/is, how/where to fit them in? The article could be linked as it is right now from Osho Discourses 1967, but all the other listings in those Timeline pages specify also a collection, eg a "book", of which the individual talk or letter is a part.

Thinking this through, it seems now the best course is to create a collective title for this and three other unpublished letters i have been sent. And other unpublished letters could eventually arrive from other sources and go in the same title or a different one, depending on whatever. That's the current thinking. -- doofus-9 18:34, 29 May 2017 (UTC)


We already have "Unpublished discourses", so let's call this new cat "Unpublished writings" - "letters" is too specific for pen-to-paper material. And with "unpublished" i mean previously unpublished in any form: digital, paper, audio or video. --Rudra (talk) 19:45, 29 May 2017 (UTC)


"Unpublished writings" sounds fine as a category. What i had in mind was an intermediate matter: In the Timeline pages, there is always a reference to a book or analogous title. If we put the individual letters directly into a category, they will not have that title. And the bibliography category pages all have titles of collections, usually books. There is not one entry in any bibliography category that is a single talk or piece of writing, except when they have been published as such, say in booklets.

So i will still try to create a "book" for them, eg "Blah-blah, Bhag 1 (ब्लाह-ब्लाह, भाग एक)", and that will be the entity which goes in a category. -- doofus-9 21:13, 29 May 2017 (UTC)


well, i propose to leave these rare writings untitled and show them at face value. just follow the links and category i've set up for these beauties and you see what i'm proposing. --Rudra (talk) 00:43, 30 May 2017 (UTC)


Okay. -- doofus-9 04:40, 30 May 2017 (UTC)