Talk:The Book of the Books, Vol 5: Difference between revisions

From The Sannyas Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Since this "book" was never published, there may be no reason to list it here in the wiki, ja? And even taken as real, it is out of step with the others in the series in that...")
 
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


And probably the same for "Vol 6", which purports to cover ''Dhammapada's'' Series 11 & 12, though at least it gets the dates right. Maybe time to pull the plug on both? -- doofus-9 07:17, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
And probably the same for "Vol 6", which purports to cover ''Dhammapada's'' Series 11 & 12, though at least it gets the dates right. Maybe time to pull the plug on both? -- doofus-9 07:17, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
---------------
the info came from the CD-ROM : "The original tape and book title was "The Book of the Books, Vols 1 - 6". Later reissued as twelve volumes under the present title."
so i still like to keep them for completness sake.--[[User:Rudra|Rudra]] ([[User talk:Rudra|talk]]) 09:40, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
---------

Revision as of 09:40, 20 December 2015

Since this "book" was never published, there may be no reason to list it here in the wiki, ja? And even taken as real, it is out of step with the others in the series in that the others parallel The Dhammapada's overall structure, ie BotB's Vol 4 = Dhammapada's Series 4 and so on, while this one leaps ahead to encompass Series 9 and 10 (which it might well do if the rest of BotB's vols did two Series each but they don't.)

And if even taking that as real, then the dates are wrong, should be Feb 11 to Mar 4. Where did the info for this thing come from?

And probably the same for "Vol 6", which purports to cover Dhammapada's Series 11 & 12, though at least it gets the dates right. Maybe time to pull the plug on both? -- doofus-9 07:17, 20 December 2015 (UTC)


the info came from the CD-ROM : "The original tape and book title was "The Book of the Books, Vols 1 - 6". Later reissued as twelve volumes under the present title."

so i still like to keep them for completness sake.--Rudra (talk) 09:40, 20 December 2015 (UTC)