Talk:Letter written on 5 Aug 1961: Difference between revisions

From The Sannyas Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 5: Line 5:
----
----


I'd say we need an expert consult. Especially regarding the 4th maybe 9th. That numeral looks more like a 4 than a 9 to me, plus i have looked for "nine" alt-forms on the net and found nothing resembling. BUT we have [[Letter written on 4 Nov 1963|another very similar case]] in Anandmayee's letters where the 4 and 9 are confused, and the hand-written form is more or less identical, so let's consult. In that case, the letter is published in ''Bhavna'' as Nov 9, which i over-ruled, perhaps incorrectly.
I'd say we need an expert consult. Especially regarding the 4th maybe 9th. That numeral looks more like a 4 than a 9 to me, plus i have looked for "nine" alt-forms on the net and found nothing resembling. BUT we have [[Letter written on 9 Nov 1963|another very similar case]] in Anandmayee's letters where the 4 and 9 are confused, and the hand-written form is more or less identical, so let's consult. In that case, the letter is published in ''Bhavna'' as Nov 9, which i over-ruled, perhaps incorrectly.


About this letter, ie the 5 Aug 1961 / 4 Aug 1961 letter, it is just a mess, probably a 5 corrected to a 4 or vice versa. Again a consult might help, but the 4 / 9 cases might settle this, since two letters on the 4th would not work. -- doofus-9 21:46, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
About this letter, ie the 5 Aug 1961 / 4 Aug 1961 letter, it is just a mess, probably a 5 corrected to a 4 or vice versa. Again a consult might help, but the 4 / 9 cases might settle this, since two letters on the 4th would not work. -- doofus-9 21:46, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
----
----
Shailendra just answered that this is number in [[Letter written on 9 Aug 1961 am]] is "9". We have other case with incorrection of this number. Will correct them soon.--DhyanAntar 04:35, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Shailendra just answered that this is number in [[Letter written on 9 Aug 1961 am]] is "9". We have other case with incorrection of this number. Will correct them soon.--DhyanAntar 04:35, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:59, 16 December 2019

On manuscript i would say the date 4th of August.

And date of Letter written on 4 Aug 1961 am (now Letter written on 9 Aug 1961 am) maybe 9th ?? (see on manuscript)--DhyanAntar 11:41, 15 December 2019 (UTC)


I'd say we need an expert consult. Especially regarding the 4th maybe 9th. That numeral looks more like a 4 than a 9 to me, plus i have looked for "nine" alt-forms on the net and found nothing resembling. BUT we have another very similar case in Anandmayee's letters where the 4 and 9 are confused, and the hand-written form is more or less identical, so let's consult. In that case, the letter is published in Bhavna as Nov 9, which i over-ruled, perhaps incorrectly.

About this letter, ie the 5 Aug 1961 / 4 Aug 1961 letter, it is just a mess, probably a 5 corrected to a 4 or vice versa. Again a consult might help, but the 4 / 9 cases might settle this, since two letters on the 4th would not work. -- doofus-9 21:46, 15 December 2019 (UTC)


Shailendra just answered that this is number in Letter written on 9 Aug 1961 am is "9". We have other case with incorrection of this number. Will correct them soon.--DhyanAntar 04:35, 16 December 2019 (UTC)