Talk:Falling in Love with Darkness: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Thanks. I really inattentive. Quite often I choose individual parts, and without even noticing it spreading on the whole. --DhyanAntar 06:03, 23 May 2017 (UTC) | Thanks. I really inattentive. Quite often I choose individual parts, and without even noticing it spreading on the whole. --DhyanAntar 06:03, 23 May 2017 (UTC) | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Hmm, we were fooled. The letters on the cover are silver. And they are such that they are black when scanned. When photographed, they look realistic, as I now. So no doubt: just one cover. --[[User:Sugit|Sugit]] ([[User talk:Sugit|talk]]) 15:43, 17 June 2017 (UTC) | Hmm, we were fooled. The letters on the cover are silver. And they are such that they are black when scanned. When photographed, they look realistic, as I now did. So no doubt: just one cover. --[[User:Sugit|Sugit]] ([[User talk:Sugit|talk]]) 15:43, 17 June 2017 (UTC) | ||
---- | ---- |
Latest revision as of 17:24, 17 June 2017
Sources so far: --Sugit (talk) 11:00, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
As i see it is not alternative cover. It's just packed in polyethylene the book and the reflection from that surface. If we look closely at the letters O and W (the word "Osho"), it clearly shows a part of reflection from the external surface. --DhyanAntar 04:09, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
That was my first thought also. But: the letters of the title: on one book black, the other white. That can't be just the plastic wrap. --Sugit (talk) 05:47, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. I really inattentive. Quite often I choose individual parts, and without even noticing it spreading on the whole. --DhyanAntar 06:03, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Hmm, we were fooled. The letters on the cover are silver. And they are such that they are black when scanned. When photographed, they look realistic, as I now did. So no doubt: just one cover. --Sugit (talk) 15:43, 17 June 2017 (UTC)