Talk:In Search of the Miraculous, Vol 1: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "So far, evidence is slim that this was published as part of the "single-volume" In Search of the Miraculous. All cover images of that tome suggest a singular focus on chakras ...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
So far, evidence is slim that this was published as part of the "single-volume" In Search of the Miraculous. All cover images of that tome suggest a singular focus on chakras and stuff, the stuff of only Vol 2, and that Vol doesn't say anything about "single-volume." More research needed? -- [[User:Sarlo|Sarlo]] ([[User talk:Sarlo|talk]]) 09:07, 26 December 2013 (PST) | So far, evidence is slim that this was published as part of the "single-volume" In Search of the Miraculous. All cover images of that tome suggest a singular focus on chakras and stuff, the stuff of only Vol 2, and that Vol doesn't say anything about "single-volume." More research needed? -- [[User:Sarlo|Sarlo]] ([[User talk:Sarlo|talk]]) 09:07, 26 December 2013 (PST) | ||
i'm sure you're right. the single volume edition only has 276 pages. --[[User:Rudra|Rudra]] ([[User talk:Rudra|talk]]) 17:46, 26 December 2013 (PST) | |||
---- | |||
Revision as of 01:46, 27 December 2013
So far, evidence is slim that this was published as part of the "single-volume" In Search of the Miraculous. All cover images of that tome suggest a singular focus on chakras and stuff, the stuff of only Vol 2, and that Vol doesn't say anything about "single-volume." More research needed? -- Sarlo (talk) 09:07, 26 December 2013 (PST)
i'm sure you're right. the single volume edition only has 276 pages. --Rudra (talk) 17:46, 26 December 2013 (PST)
