Talk:From Bhagwan to Osho: What's in a name?: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
also, #2 sannyas.net is no longer online. when did you find that ? i just send Mitra (the sysop) a message to find out if sannyas.net is permanently down. | also, #2 sannyas.net is no longer online. when did you find that ? i just send Mitra (the sysop) a message to find out if sannyas.net is permanently down. | ||
--[[User:Rudra|Rudra]] ([[User talk:Rudra|talk]]) 02:12, 10 June 2015 (UTC) | --[[User:Rudra|Rudra]] ([[User talk:Rudra|talk]]) 02:12, 10 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
---- | |||
The numbers are their rank in a g**gle search. I'm not sure it would make any sense to move them around. I could roll the dice and keep trying different searches. I did just now and the results were: lots of different ordering, and gone are 5, 6, and 10, replaced by a different osho.com WJ quote, Allah to Zen and one of Vedant's books, the one i referred to as having a bad copy. Mitra is not only still there but is up to #1. His site is still on the air, even if inactive. Possibly g**gle gives points in their algorithm for historic value. I dunno -- [[User:Sarlo|doofus-9]] ([[User talk:Sarlo|talk]]) 06:39, 10 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
---- | ---- |
Revision as of 06:39, 10 June 2015
re The WJV examples :
wouldn't it make more sense to move #5 and #6 to position #1 and #2 ?
also, #2 sannyas.net is no longer online. when did you find that ? i just send Mitra (the sysop) a message to find out if sannyas.net is permanently down. --Rudra (talk) 02:12, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
The numbers are their rank in a g**gle search. I'm not sure it would make any sense to move them around. I could roll the dice and keep trying different searches. I did just now and the results were: lots of different ordering, and gone are 5, 6, and 10, replaced by a different osho.com WJ quote, Allah to Zen and one of Vedant's books, the one i referred to as having a bad copy. Mitra is not only still there but is up to #1. His site is still on the air, even if inactive. Possibly g**gle gives points in their algorithm for historic value. I dunno -- doofus-9 (talk) 06:39, 10 June 2015 (UTC)