Talk:Books signed by Osho: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
m (Rudra moved page Talk:Books signed and gifted by Osho to Talk:Books signed by Osho without leaving a redirect) |
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 10:34, 30 September 2019
This [Pelmanism -- Lesson V] being the first book in the wiki relating to Osho's library, no particular format has been followed. It may be that when more come, "{{booklib}}" or some such template may need to be created. And where to put the Osho's library category? And does "signed by Osho" -- ie we have an image of that -- merit a sub-category? Great matters to ponder. -- doofus-9 07:28, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
it's silly to create categories about matters we have no info about. we have no idea what is in Osho's library and we most likely never will. so i would like to remove that cat again. --Rudra 10:34, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Why "and gifted" ? Would we mention books here if they would only be "gifted", not signed? If not, then just "Signed" is enough.
I am a bit worried about the very minimal info found on the page. At least, we should mention how we got those pages. On what authority do we know to be true what it says.
"Signed and gifted to the Gadarwara Library" : do we have a link for more on that story?
How about making a header / TOC for the categories, like on the source or "gifted to Gadarwara" etc, we can be flexible in what the categories are.
And then a sub-header for each book, at least writing the title of the book and the date of the signature. --Sugit (talk) 05:15, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
I tried to add sub-headers and dates... Not so good. Pls. correct the page. And then later perhaps someone will add an info on the story.--DhyanAntar 08:43, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
- do we mention unsigned books here : of course not. this page shows his manuscripts, not his gifts.
- about the source: we have to ask the source if it's ok to mention her/him here.
--Rudra 09:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
