Talk:Earthen Lamps: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
---------- | ---------- | ||
This 2012 edition is not a Translated First Edition because [[The Earthen Lamps]] (1968) is. And btw, this one does not have the ch.22 problem, it was corrected in this 2012 edition (but wrong in the 1968 edition). --[[User:Sugit|Sugit]] ([[User talk:Sugit|talk]]) 12:08, 25 September 2019 (UTC) | This 2012 edition is not a Translated First Edition because [[The Earthen Lamps]] (1968) is. And btw, this one does not have the ch.22 problem, it was corrected in this 2012 edition (but wrong in the 1968 edition). --[[User:Sugit|Sugit]] ([[User talk:Sugit|talk]]) 12:08, 25 September 2019 (UTC) | ||
-------- | |||
IF it was corrected already in the 2012 edition, why does it only have 59 stories? --Rudra 14:01, 25 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
-------- | |||
Revision as of 14:01, 25 September 2019
This book is not Translated First Edition. One additional parable was in first edition: see commentaries on that Talk:Manuscripts ~ Mitti Ke Diye (मिट्टी के दीये). --DhyanAntar 16:07, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for corrections and additions, Sugit. --DhyanAntar 05:11, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
why is it not a translated first edition? it contains the same text (if we just ignore the incorrect bundeling of story 22 and 23 into one).
but what i find typical of OIF is to now credit the translation to themselves, another addition to their copyright trickery. --Rudra 12:01, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
This 2012 edition is not a Translated First Edition because The Earthen Lamps (1968) is. And btw, this one does not have the ch.22 problem, it was corrected in this 2012 edition (but wrong in the 1968 edition). --Sugit (talk) 12:08, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
IF it was corrected already in the 2012 edition, why does it only have 59 stories? --Rudra 14:01, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
