Talk:Letter written on 5 Aug 1961: Difference between revisions
Dhyanantar (talk | contribs) (Created page with "On manuscript i would say the date 4th of August. And date of Letter written on 4 Aug 1961 am maybe 9th ?? (see on manuscript)--~~~~") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
On manuscript i would say the date 4th of August. | On manuscript i would say the date 4th of August. | ||
And date of [[Letter written on 4 Aug 1961 am]] maybe 9th ?? (see on manuscript)--DhyanAntar 11:41, 15 December 2019 (UTC) | And date of [[Letter written on 4 Aug 1961 am]] maybe 9th ?? (see on manuscript)--DhyanAntar 11:41, 15 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
---- | |||
I'd say we need an expert consult. Especially regarding the 4th maybe 9th. That numeral looks more like a 4 than a 9 to me, plus i have looked for "nine" alt-forms on the net and found nothing resembling. BUT we have [[Letter written on 4 Nov 1963|another very similar case]] in Anandmayee's letters where the 4 and 9 are confused, and the hand-written form is more or less identical, so let's consult. In that case, the letter is published in ''Bhavna'' as Nov 9, which i over-ruled, perhaps incorrectly. | |||
About this letter, ie the 5 Aug 1961 / 4 Aug 1961 letter, it is just a mess, probably a 5 corrected to a 4 or vice versa. Again a consult might help, but the 4 / 9 cases might settle this, since two letters on the 4th would not work. -- doofus-9 21:46, 15 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:46, 15 December 2019
On manuscript i would say the date 4th of August.
And date of Letter written on 4 Aug 1961 am maybe 9th ?? (see on manuscript)--DhyanAntar 11:41, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
I'd say we need an expert consult. Especially regarding the 4th maybe 9th. That numeral looks more like a 4 than a 9 to me, plus i have looked for "nine" alt-forms on the net and found nothing resembling. BUT we have another very similar case in Anandmayee's letters where the 4 and 9 are confused, and the hand-written form is more or less identical, so let's consult. In that case, the letter is published in Bhavna as Nov 9, which i over-ruled, perhaps incorrectly.
About this letter, ie the 5 Aug 1961 / 4 Aug 1961 letter, it is just a mess, probably a 5 corrected to a 4 or vice versa. Again a consult might help, but the 4 / 9 cases might settle this, since two letters on the 4th would not work. -- doofus-9 21:46, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
