Talk:Samajvad Se Savdhan (समाजवाद से सावधान)

From The Sannyas Wiki
Revision as of 07:20, 1 July 2014 by Sarlo (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Neeten's Appendix page (see Osho Source Book link at his page) is loaded with factual information about Osho's early work, but still in rough form (as of t...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Neeten's Appendix page (see Osho Source Book link at his page) is loaded with factual information about Osho's early work, but still in rough form (as of this writing) and not all confirmed for accuracy. When we come to Swarn Pakhi, the über-series, we find the info below, which may be useful if adapted with a little inspiration:

There is only one entry for Swarn Pakhi per se, a single date, Apr 1, 1970 in Bombay. We may suppose that this is one of its discourses, which may be scattered around on different dates, or may be all in one chunk, since there is a decent-size gap following that time (see Osho Discourses 1970). There IS a talk the day before, Mar 31, in Jabalpur, which may or may not be a conflict.

There is stronger info about the other parts of the series, but there are snags there too: There are three entries for Samajwad Se Savdhan, enough for the three other volumes of Swarn Pakhi, and as if that were the über-name. In any case, it is not much of a stretch to take these three entries to refer to the first three volumes, especially as they correspond well regarding discourse counts (5, 5 and 4). The relevant section of the appendix reads:

Samajwad Se Savdhaan. 13-17.03.1970. 5 talks. Bombay. [(Bharat Ke Jalte Prashan (भारत के जलते प्रश्न))]
Vidroh Kya Hai? 31.03.1970. [the talk in Jabalpur]
Swarn Pakhi Tha Jo Kabhi (India, Socialism, Gandhi, Communism). 01.04.1970. Bombay. (A)
Samajvaad Se Saavdhan. 13.04-17.04.1970. [(The real Samajwad Se Savdhan (समाजवाद से सावधान))]
[ . . . ]
Samajwad Se Savdhaan. 08-11.08.1970. 4 talks. [(Samajvad Arthat Atmaghat (समाजवाद अर्थात आत्मघात))]

At this point we are in surmise-land, not really proven TRVTH, but it looks good enough for a provisional go, so allons-y. -- Sarlo (talk) 00:20, 1 July 2014 (PDT)