Talk:Nahin Jog, Nahin Jaap (नहीं जोग, नहिं जाप): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "It should of course be Nahi<u>n</u> Jog Nahi<u>n</u> Jaap, according to the Devanagari on the cover -- and our own Devanagari, and even on Diamond's pub info page, referring t...") |
Dhyanantar (talk | contribs) m (Dhyanantar moved page Talk:Nahin Jog, Nahin Jaap (Kabir-Vani) (नहीं जोग, नहिं जाप (कबीर-वाणी)) to Talk:Nahin Jog, Nahin Jaap (नहीं जोग, नहिं जाप) without leaving a redirect) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It should of course be Nahi<u>n</u> Jog Nahi<u>n</u> Jaap, according to the Devanagari on the cover -- and our own Devanagari, and even on Diamond's pub info page, referring to OIF's copyright claim -- but both Diamond and G**gle Books call it Nahi, so who are we to argue? -- doofus-9 08:07, 7 December 2018 (UTC) | It should of course be Nahi<u>n</u> Jog Nahi<u>n</u> Jaap, according to the Devanagari on the cover -- and our own Devanagari, and even on Diamond's pub info page, referring to OIF's copyright claim -- but both Diamond and G**gle Books call it Nahi, so who are we to argue? -- doofus-9 08:07, 7 December 2018 (UTC) | ||
---- | |||
We should be consistent in definition of transliterations. So i will change the title.--DhyanAntar 08:48, 7 December 2018 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 13:34, 7 November 2020
It should of course be Nahin Jog Nahin Jaap, according to the Devanagari on the cover -- and our own Devanagari, and even on Diamond's pub info page, referring to OIF's copyright claim -- but both Diamond and G**gle Books call it Nahi, so who are we to argue? -- doofus-9 08:07, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
We should be consistent in definition of transliterations. So i will change the title.--DhyanAntar 08:48, 7 December 2018 (UTC)