The New Dawn ~ 21: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Dhyanantar (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Dhyanantar (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
stitle = DAWN21 | | stitle = DAWN21 | | ||
notes = | | notes = | | ||
syn = Reader of the | syn = Reader of the questions: [[Ma Prem Maneesha]]. | ||
:Question 1 from [[Sw Devageet]] | |||
::Beloved Osho, I heard you speak of scientists choosing future people from their genetic analysis of sperms. I have no trust in scientists, or doctors or anybody whose knowledge extends no further than their head. I intuitively feel that genetics plays only a small role in determining what a person becomes. A gardener may well have become a musician; a soldier may have the potential to be a scientist. Surely what a man is, is no measure of what he might have been in different circumstances. | |||
Beloved master, who could have foreseen a osho in the sperm and egg of your father and mother? Please speak more on the underlying sanity behind your suggestion -- which I cannot see because of my fear of totalitarian regimes. | |||
:([[Glossary#source_of_quotes_in_the_synopsis|source:''CD-ROM'']]) | |||
| | |||
prevevent = The New Dawn ~ 20 | | prevevent = The New Dawn ~ 20 | | ||
nextevent = The New Dawn ~ 22 | | nextevent = The New Dawn ~ 22 | | ||
Revision as of 06:08, 20 April 2019
| event type | discourse |
| date & time | 28 Jun 1987 pm |
| location | Chuang Tzu Auditorium, Pune |
| language | English |
| audio | Available, duration 1h 43min. Quality: good, but a constant noise (under revision). Live music after the discourse. |
| online audio | |
| video | Available, duration 1h 44min. Quality: good, but a constant audio-noise. |
| online video | |
| see also |
|
| online text | find the PDF of this discourse |
| shorttitle | DAWN21 |
- notes
- synopsis
- Reader of the questions: Ma Prem Maneesha.
- Question 1 from Sw Devageet
- Beloved Osho, I heard you speak of scientists choosing future people from their genetic analysis of sperms. I have no trust in scientists, or doctors or anybody whose knowledge extends no further than their head. I intuitively feel that genetics plays only a small role in determining what a person becomes. A gardener may well have become a musician; a soldier may have the potential to be a scientist. Surely what a man is, is no measure of what he might have been in different circumstances.
Beloved master, who could have foreseen a osho in the sperm and egg of your father and mother? Please speak more on the underlying sanity behind your suggestion -- which I cannot see because of my fear of totalitarian regimes.
| ◄ Previous event | Next event ► |
| ◄ Previous in series | Next in series ► |
