Talk:Mitti Ke Diye (मिट्टी के दीये): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
we have here 59 "lectures", 163/204 pages (4th ed) and app 85 manuscript pages. | we have here 59 "lectures", 163/204 pages (4th ed) and app 85 manuscript pages. | ||
i’m a bit confused how Arvind (and subsequent editors) managed to transcribe 85 man. pages into 163 (and even 204) book pages. | i’m a bit confused how Arvind (and subsequent editors) managed to transcribe 85 man. pages into 163 (and even 204) book pages. | ||
the printed book looks rather dense | the printed book looks rather dense | ||
see [https://books.google.com.au/books?id=a10-QkMU3o0C&printsec=frontcover&dq=isbn:8128814435&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjiu97KyaPJAhVh4qYKHTKAAvYQ6AEIHDAA#v=onepage&q&f=false Google books] | (see [https://books.google.com.au/books?id=a10-QkMU3o0C&printsec=frontcover&dq=isbn:8128814435&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjiu97KyaPJAhVh4qYKHTKAAvYQ6AEIHDAA#v=onepage&q&f=false Google books]) | ||
so maybe the manuscript collection is not complete ? | so maybe the manuscript collection is not complete ? | ||
--[[User:Rudra|Rudra]] ([[User talk:Rudra|talk]]) 07:51, 22 November 2015 (UTC) | --[[User:Rudra|Rudra]] ([[User talk:Rudra|talk]]) 07:51, 22 November 2015 (UTC) | ||
------ | ------ |
Revision as of 08:13, 22 November 2015
This book was formerly dated 1967, with "letters" indicated as the original source material, which info is found in the CD-ROM. A closer reading of the CD-ROM reveals that they are first and most prominently so labelled but, as a sort of subtitle it says, "Collection of lecture talks and stories from his lectures". This aligns better with info found chez Neeten (see Osho Source Book link at his page), specifically in the Manuscripts section of his Appendix page. Neeten has documented these hand-written notes (not letters) and also their publication in 1966, so info here has been updated. -- doofus-9 (talk) 17:26, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
we have here 59 "lectures", 163/204 pages (4th ed) and app 85 manuscript pages.
i’m a bit confused how Arvind (and subsequent editors) managed to transcribe 85 man. pages into 163 (and even 204) book pages.
the printed book looks rather dense (see Google books)
so maybe the manuscript collection is not complete ? --Rudra (talk) 07:51, 22 November 2015 (UTC)