Talk:Trademarks and copyright: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
Swamisitar (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
--[[User:Rudra|Rudra]] ([[User talk:Rudra|talk]]) 21:02, 24 July 2015 (UTC) | --[[User:Rudra|Rudra]] ([[User talk:Rudra|talk]]) 21:02, 24 July 2015 (UTC) | ||
---- | ---- | ||
==Yoga as a sponteneous happening== | |||
The discussion was about making scans of the book pages available to the public on the web site.... | |||
It most certainly would not fall under fair use to copy an entire book. | |||
+ | |||
(further comments moved to and continued at [[Talk:Trademarks and copyright]] ...) | |||
− | |||
The alleged copyright owner will cite in court the effect this will have upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. | |||
+ | |||
− | |||
In other words, their chance of selling a printed edition will diminish if the book is freely available in the wiki. Case closed.--[[User:Rudra|Rudra]] ([[User talk:Rudra|talk]]) 00:42, 2 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
+ | |||
− | |||
+ | |||
− | |||
---- | |||
+ | |||
− | |||
+ | |||
− | |||
The case is not entirely closed just yet, but possibly still adjar. If I made an attempt to contact the copyright owner and got permission from them, it would not at all be a violation of copyright law. However if they decided to say no, the possible status of adjar would be closed until the copyright expired in another 35+ years. Would it be worth pursuing this effort for our own edification? Does anyone know if the copyright holder is still around or is the copyright orphaned? [[User:Swamisitar|Swamisitar]] ([[User talk:Swamisitar|talk]]) 05:35, 2 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:35, 2 November 2015
How are the non-colored registered trademarks not active anymore? What is the difference between red and pink? --Sugit (talk) 06:36, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
there are 3 types
- active (poison purple)
- opposed and cancelled (green/blue)
- expired (white)
green are major opposition/court cases and blue are those that got cancelled due to losing the major case, kind of collateral damage ;)
--Rudra (talk) 21:02, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Yoga as a sponteneous happening
The discussion was about making scans of the book pages available to the public on the web site....
It most certainly would not fall under fair use to copy an entire book. + (further comments moved to and continued at Talk:Trademarks and copyright ...) − The alleged copyright owner will cite in court the effect this will have upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. + − In other words, their chance of selling a printed edition will diminish if the book is freely available in the wiki. Case closed.--Rudra (talk) 00:42, 2 November 2015 (UTC) + −
+ −
+ −
+ − The case is not entirely closed just yet, but possibly still adjar. If I made an attempt to contact the copyright owner and got permission from them, it would not at all be a violation of copyright law. However if they decided to say no, the possible status of adjar would be closed until the copyright expired in another 35+ years. Would it be worth pursuing this effort for our own edification? Does anyone know if the copyright holder is still around or is the copyright orphaned? Swamisitar (talk) 05:35, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
