Talk:Suli Upar Sej Piya Ki (सूली ऊपर सेज पिया की): Difference between revisions

From The Sannyas Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "The dissonance in dates for events ''Suli Upar Sej Piya Ki ~ 01 ~ 08'' among two available sources: * Neeten: '''Nov 10''' 1970 to '''Nov 17''' 1970 (see Talk:Jyon Ki Tyon...")
 
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:


The current [[Osho Timeline 1970|Timeline]] has 10-17 of November according to dates from Hindi original ''[[Suli Upar Sej Piya Ki (सूली ऊपर सेज पिया की)]]'' and ''[[Jyon Ki Tyon Dhari Dinhi Chadariya (ज्यों की त्यों धरि दीन्हीं चदरिया)]]''. BUT English book ''The Perennial Path: The Art of Living'' has on one day less - from Nov 9, 1970 to Nov 16, 1970 as on CD-ROM. What is right?
The current [[Osho Timeline 1970|Timeline]] has 10-17 of November according to dates from Hindi original ''[[Suli Upar Sej Piya Ki (सूली ऊपर सेज पिया की)]]'' and ''[[Jyon Ki Tyon Dhari Dinhi Chadariya (ज्यों की त्यों धरि दीन्हीं चदरिया)]]''. BUT English book ''The Perennial Path: The Art of Living'' has on one day less - from Nov 9, 1970 to Nov 16, 1970 as on CD-ROM. What is right?
----
Flip a coin! One factor that might eventually tip the balance is to consider the relative independence of sources. For example, the CD-ROM's source is undoubtedly ''The Perennial Path'', so it is not really independent. Same might be said for What Osho Said and Where. Can the book be wrong? Yes, but not likely. One possible answer: ask Neeten what are his sources? Is he sure? How did HE decide to make it Nov 10-17? -- doofus-9 16:07, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:07, 28 September 2018

The dissonance in dates for events Suli Upar Sej Piya Ki ~ 01 ~ 08 among two available sources:


The current Timeline has 10-17 of November according to dates from Hindi original Suli Upar Sej Piya Ki (सूली ऊपर सेज पिया की) and Jyon Ki Tyon Dhari Dinhi Chadariya (ज्यों की त्यों धरि दीन्हीं चदरिया). BUT English book The Perennial Path: The Art of Living has on one day less - from Nov 9, 1970 to Nov 16, 1970 as on CD-ROM. What is right?


Flip a coin! One factor that might eventually tip the balance is to consider the relative independence of sources. For example, the CD-ROM's source is undoubtedly The Perennial Path, so it is not really independent. Same might be said for What Osho Said and Where. Can the book be wrong? Yes, but not likely. One possible answer: ask Neeten what are his sources? Is he sure? How did HE decide to make it Nov 10-17? -- doofus-9 16:07, 28 September 2018 (UTC)