Talk:Krishna: Guru Bhi, Sakha Bhi (कृष्ण : गुरु भी, सखा भी)

From The Sannyas Wiki
Revision as of 00:05, 17 August 2017 by Sarlo (talk | contribs) (Created page with "About "This title appears to be a compilation or severe abridgement of one or more of Osho's other books on Krishna, and thus far has been found only as a Diamond publication"...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

About "This title appears to be a compilation or severe abridgement of one or more of Osho's other books on Krishna, and thus far has been found only as a Diamond publication", audio has never been found, and the chapter titles (see TOC below) are all unique to this book.

अनुक्रम (TOC):
1. अभिनयपूर्ण जीवन के प्रतीक कृष्ण . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2. फलाकांक्षामुक्त कर्म के प्रतीक कृष्ण . . . . . . . . . . .41
3. राजपथरुप भव्य जीवनधारा के प्रतीक कृष्ण . . . . . .67
4. वंशी रूप जीवन के प्रतीक कृष्ण . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
5. एक विशेष प्रवचन -- प्रश्नोत्तरों से अनुगामित . . . 137

More than you need to know on this ... Krishna Guru Bhi is promoted in the back of Ageh Bharti's book Spandana among a list of four other "ओशो - कृष्णा वाणी" (Osho on Krishna) books published by Diamond. They are:

कृष्णा : जिज्ञासा, खोज, उपलब्धि
कृष्णा साधना रहित सिद्धि
कृष्णा और हंसता हुआ धर्म
साक्षी कृष्णा और रासलीला

Ageh's book was published fwiw in 2003, though G**gle Books says 2004. Who knows if the other books are still in print, but they all are titles unique to Diamond.

About the "2014" edition, Diamond seems to have the practice of just putting their pub year as the edition number. Which is okay, but it avoids making the distinctions often made between editions, such as if the content has been revised. The odd thing about this particular edition is that the "2014" appears not to have been printed but stickered over some other year. Thus it may not be different in any way from previous editions.

And in the standard "do not copy" blah-blah at the bottom, we find "Sadhana Foundation's" name invoked in bold, as if they were once the nominal copyright holders. Or something. -- doofus-9 00:05, 17 August 2017 (UTC)